<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Frontiers in Dentistry">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Frontiers in Dentistry</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2676-296X</Issn>
      <Volume>12</Volume>
      <Issue>8</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>09</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Self-Reported Knowledge and Attitude of Dentists towards Prescription of Fluoride</title>
    <FirstPage>550</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>556</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Afsaneh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Pakdaman</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Zahra</FirstName>
        <LastName>Yarahmadi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad Javad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kharazifard</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>26</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>26</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Objectives: This study aimed to assess the self-reported knowledge and attitude of dentists towards fluoride prescription.

Materials and Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted at the national annual dental congress in 2010 in Tehran-Iran. Dentists&#x2019; level of knowledge about the preventive effects of systemic and topical administration of fluoride was assessed as well as their attitudes towards its application. Self-reported practice for two paper patients (a child and an adult with high risk of dental caries) was assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS, chi-square test and logistic regression.

Results: A total of 347 dentists including 232 (73.4%) males and 84 (26.6%) females responded; 84.7% agreed/strongly agreed with addition of fluoride to water and 66% agreed with prescription of fluoride tablets/drops in fluoride-deficient areas. Fluoridated toothpastes were considered useful by 85.3%; this rate was 78.7% for fluoride rinse and 87.6% for fluoride varnish, foam or gel. The majority of dentists (67.4%) reported no access to clear guidelines on fluoride application; 83% considered fluoride to be effective for caries prevention in children less than 12 years and 39.2% believed it was useful for adults and adolescents; 50% of the respondents correctly managed the high-risk child and adult with respect to appropriate selection of fluoride product. Younger dentists (OR=0.94; 95% CI 0.8-0.9; P=0.043) and new graduates (OR=0.94; 95% CI 0.89-0.99; P=0.034) were more likely to correctly manage the high-risk child.&#xA0;&#xA0;

Conclusion: Dentists had good knowledge and positive attitudes towards fluoride application. New graduates were more likely to correctly manage the young high-risk patient.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/1033</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/download/1033/797</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
