<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Frontiers in Dentistry">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Frontiers in Dentistry</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2676-296X</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2007</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Comparison of Calcium Hydroxide and Bioactive Glass after Direct Pulp Capping in Primary Teeth</title>
    <FirstPage>155</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>159</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>R.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haghgoo</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahed University of Me</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>N.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Jalayer Naderi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, School of Dentistry, Shahed University of Medical Scie</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>03</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Objective: Bioactive glass is often used as a filler material for repair of dental bone defects.


In different studies osteogenic potential of this material was proved, but its dentinogenesis


property is in doubt. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the histological


pulp responses of Calcium hydroxide and Bioactive glass placed directly on exposed pulp


tissues.


Materials and Methods: Twenty teeth to be extracted due to orthodontic reasons were


selected. These teeth were divided into two groups and treated with direct pulp capping.


Calcium hydroxide was used for 10 teeth and Bioactive glass for 10 teeth. After 60 days


the teeth were extracted and prepared for histological evaluation. Finally the data was analyzed


with exact Fisher test.


Results: All teeth treated with Calcium hydroxide showed inflammation. Internal resorption


was seen in six teeth, abscess in five teeth and dentinal bridge in two teeth. Inflammation


was seen in three Bioactive glass samples and dentinal bridge in seven teeth, but internal


resorption and abscess were not seen.


Conclusion: Bioactive glass appears to be superior to Calcium hydroxide as a pulp capping


agent in primary teeth.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/131</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/download/131/131</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
