<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Frontiers in Dentistry">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Frontiers in Dentistry</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2676-296X</Issn>
      <Volume>7</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2010</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Effect of Resin Coating and Chlorhexidine on Microleakage of Two Resin Cements after Storage</title>
    <FirstPage>31</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>40</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName>F. Shafie</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Me</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName>M. Doozandeh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Postgraduate Student, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of M</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName>A. Alavi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Assistant Professor, Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>03</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Objective: Evaluating the effect of resin coating and chlorhexidine on microleakage of
two resin cements after water storage.
Materials and Methods: Standardized class V cavities were prepared on facial and lingual
surfaces of one hundred twenty intact human molars with gingival margins placed 1
mm below the cemento-enamel junction. Indirect composite inlays were fabricated and the
specimens were randomly assigned into 6 groups. In Groups 1 to 4, inlays were cemented
with Panavia F2.0 cement. G1: according to the manufacturer's instruction. G2: with light
cured resin on the ED primer. G3: chlorhexidine application before priming. G4: with
chlorhexidine application before priming and light cured resin on primer. G5: inlays were
cemented with Nexus 2 resin cement. G6: chlorhexidine application after etching. Each
group was divided into two subgroups based on the 24-hour and 6-month water storage
time. After preparation for microleakage test, the teeth were sectioned and evaluated at
both margins under a 20&#xD7; stereomicroscope. Dye penetration was scored using 0-3 criteria.
The data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and complementary Dunn tests.
Results: There was significantly less leakage in G2 and G4 than the Panavia F2.0 control
group at gingival margins after 6 months (P&lt;0.05). There was no significant differences in
leakage between G1 and G3 at both margins after 24 hours and 6 months storage. After 6
months, G6 revealed significantly less leakage than G5 at gingival margins (P=0.033). In
general, gingival margins showed more leakage than occlusal margins.
Conclusion: Additionally, resin coating in self-etch (Panavia F2.0) and chlorhexidine application
in etch-rinse (Nexus) resin cement reduced microleakage at gingival margins after
storage.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/207</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/download/207/207</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
