<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Frontiers in Dentistry">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Frontiers in Dentistry</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2676-296X</Issn>
      <Volume>22</Volume>
      <Issue>0</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>22</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Assessing the Impact of Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Oral Health Related Quality of Life: Non-Randomized Clinical Trial</title>
    <FirstPage>4958</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>4958</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Atefe</FirstName>
        <LastName>Saffar Shahroudi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">1. Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Rashin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Bahrami</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2023</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>19</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>17</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Objectives: This study aimed to compare the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and self-perceived satisfaction of patients wearing Hawley (HR) or Essix retainer (ER) using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire.
&#xD;

Materials and Methods: Sixty patients who had recently completed orthodontic treatment and received either an HR or ER were recruited. Participants completed the OHIP-14 questionnaire one week (T1) and two months (T2) after receiving their retainers. Self-perceived satisfaction with the retainers was also recorded.
&#xD;

Results: The ER group showed significantly lower overall OHIP-14 scores than the HR group at both T1 and T2. In 14 OHIP items, HR scored higher in all except &#x201C;sense of taste&#x201D; (T1 and T2), &#x201C;unsatisfactory diet&#x201D; (T1), and &#x201C;uncomfortable eating&#x201D; (T2). From T1 to T2, overall OHIP-14 scores decreased significantly in both groups, with reductions in 10 items for ER and 8 items for HR. The mean satisfaction score (out of 3) was higher for ER (2.5&#xB1;0.5) than for HR (1.23&#xB1;0.43), and satisfaction increased significantly in both groups over time.
&#xD;

Conclusion: ER had less negative impact on OHRQoL than HR. After two months, most OHIP-14 dimensions showed improvement in both groups, indicating patient adaptation to retainers and reduced discomfort over time. Adaptation was slightly greater with ER, and overall satisfaction was higher compared to HR.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/4958</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/download/4958/2191</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
