<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Frontiers in Dentistry">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Frontiers in Dentistry</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2676-296X</Issn>
      <Volume>14</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Diagnostic Value of Conventional and Digital Radiography for Detection of Cavitated and Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries</title>
    <FirstPage>21</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>30</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahdieh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Dehghani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Rasool</FirstName>
        <LastName>Barzegari</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Dentist, Yazd, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hosein</FirstName>
        <LastName>Tabatabai</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Associate Professor, Department of Oral Pathology, Social Determinants of Oral Health Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sahar</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghanea</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>02</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of conventional and digital radiography for detection of cavitated and non-cavitated proximal caries.
Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted human premolars and molars were mounted in a silicone block. Charge-coupled device (CCD) and photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) receptors and intra-oral films were exposed with 60 and 70 kVp with parallel technique. Two observers interpreted the radiographs twice with a two-week interval using a 5-point scale. Teeth were then serially sectioned in mesiodistal direction and evaluated under a stereomicroscope (gold standard). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated.
Results: Sensitivity of all three receptors for detection of enamel lesions was low (5.5-44.4%) but it was higher for dentin lesions (42.8-62.8%); PSP with 70 kVp and 0.03s exposure time had the highest sensitivity for enamel lesions, but the difference among receptors was not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05). Sensitivity of all three receptors for detection of non-cavitated lesions was lower than that for cavitated lesions; PSP with 60 kVp and 0.07s exposure time had higher sensitivity and lower patient radiation dose for detection of cavitated and non-cavitated lesions, but the difference was not significant (P&gt;0.05).
Conclusions: Digital radiography using PSP receptor with 70 kVp is recommended to detect initial enamel caries. For detection of non-cavitated and cavitated dentin caries, PSP with 60 kVp is more appropriate. Change in kVp did not affect the diagnostic accuracy for detection of caries, and type of receptor was a more important factor.
&#xD;

&#xA0;</abstract>
    <web_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/838</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/download/838/932</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
