Effect of Mechanical Loads and Surface Roughness on Wear of Silorane and Methacrylate-Based Posterior Composites
Abstract
Objectives: Dental composite wear in posterior restorations is a concern and is affected by different factors. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of polishing and mechanical loads on wear of silorane-based and methyl methacrylate-based composites resins.
Materials and Methods: Of each dental composite (Filtek P90 and Filtek P60), 40 samples were fabricated in a polyethylene mold (4mm diameter, 10mm height). According to the finishing and/or polishing protocols (180-grit or 2500-grit silicon carbide papers), the samples of each composite were divided into two groups. Surface roughness (Rₔ) was measured and recorded using a contact profilometer. The weight of each sample was also measured in grams. The wear test was performed in a pin-on-disc device under two different loads (70N, 150N). Afterwards, samples were subjected to profilometry and their weight was measured again. Data were analyzed using t-test and univariate ANOVA. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Higher mechanical load resulted in greater weight loss (P<0.001). Samples polished with 2500-grit papers showed significantly lower Ra changes compared to those polished with 180-grit papers (P<0.001). Filtek P90 had greater weight loss than Filtek P60 except in one condition (180-grit, 70N).
Conclusions: Results showed that wear of posterior composite restorations depends on mechanical load, type of composite resin and surface properties.
- Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Carvalho CA, Franco EB, van Dijken JW, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: a five-year follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Apr;140(4):447-54.
- Cetin AR, Unlu N. One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):620-6.
- Wonglamsam A, Kakuta K, Ogura H. Effects of occlusal and brushing cycles on wear of composite resins in combined wear test. Dent Mater J. 2008 Mar;27(2):243-50.
- Turssi CP, de Moraes Purquerio B, Serra MC. Wear of dental resin composites: insights into underlying processes and assessment methods--a review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003 May;65(2):280-5.
- Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):441-58.
- Pérez MM, Ghinea R, Ugarte-Alván LI, Pulgar R, Paravina RD. Color and translucency in silorane-based resin composite compared to universal and nanofilled composites. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e110-6.
- Han JM, Zhang H, Choe HS, Lin H, Zheng G, Hong G. Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(6):725-32.
- Hahnel S, Schultz S, Trempler C, Ach B, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Apr;4(3):237-44.
- Soliman TA, Tubaigy KM, Raffat EM, Al-Agha EI. In vitro solubility and wear rates of silorane and dimethacrylate resin based composite restorative materials under different pH conditions. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):9-13.
- Kon M, Kakuta K, Ogura H. Effects of occlusal and brushing forces on wear of composite resins. Dent Mater J. 2006 Mar;25(1):183-94.
- Shabanian M, Richards LC. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jun;87(6):650-6.
- Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater. 2005 Jul;21(7):641-8.
- Leinfelder KF. Wear patterns and rates of posterior composite resins. Int Dent J. 1987 Sep;37(3):152-7.
- Roberson T, Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 6th ed., New York, NY, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012:e56.
- Ferracane JL. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater. 2006 Aug;22(8):689-92.
- Kanter J, Koski RE, Martin D. The relationship of weight loss to surface roughness of composite resins from simulated toothbrushing. J Prosthet Dent. 1982 May;47(5):505-13.
- Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater. 1996 Jul;12(4):218-26.
- Xu HC, Tong W, Song SQ. Wear patterns of composite restorative resins in vivo; observations by scanning electron microscopy. J Oral Rehabil. 1985 Sep;12(5):389-400.
- Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res. 1989 Dec;68(12):1752-4.
- Ghazal M, Kern M. Wear of human enamel and nano‐filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces. J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Jan;36(1):58-64.
- Heintze S, Forjanic M, Ohmiti K, Rousson V. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater. 2010 Apr;26(4):306-19.
- Oh WS, DeLong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):451-9.
- Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder KF, Thomas J. Effect of finishing on the in vivo wear rate of a posterior composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Mar;118(3):333-5.
- Kakuta K, Wonglamsam A, Goto S, Ogura H. Surface textures of composite resins after combined wear test simulating both occlusal wear and brushing wear. Dent Mater J. 2012 Feb;31(1):61-7.
- Zantner C, Kielbassa AM, Martus P, Kunzelmann KH. Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers. Dent Mater. 2004 Mar;20(3):277-85.
- Clelland NL, Villarroel SC, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Simulated oral wear of packable composites. Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):830-7.
- Wang L, Garcia FC, Amarante de Araújo P, Franco EB, Mondelli RF. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(5):303-14.
- Turssi CP, Faraoni-Romano JJ, de Menezes M, Serra MC. Comparative study of the wear behavior of composites for posterior restorations. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Jan;18(1):143-7.
- Nagarajan VS, Jahanmir S, Thompson VP. In vitro contact wear of dental composites. Dent Mater. 2004 Jan;20(1):63-71.
- Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Adey JD. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater. 2002 Jan;18(1):1-11.
- Johnsen GF, Taxt-Lamolle SF, Haugen HJ. Wear model simulating clinical abrasion on composite filling materials. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(5):739-48.
- Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR, Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res. 1997 Aug;76(8):1508-16.
- Jørgesen KD. Restorative resins: abrasion vs. mechanical properties. Scand J Dent Res. 1980 Dec;88(6):557-68.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 13, No 6 (2016) | |
| Section | Original Article | |
| Keywords | ||
| Dental Restoration Wear Surface Properties Silorane Composite Resin | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
