Changes of the Mandible after Orthodontic Treatment with and without Extraction of Four Premolars
,
Abstract
Objectives: This study was designed to assess the changes of the mandible of patients who underwent orthodontic treatment with or without extraction of four premolars.
Materials and Methods: Eighteen Class I bimaxillary protrusion patients treated with extraction of four first premolars and retraction of anterior teeth and 18 Class I non-extraction patients with a mean age of 16.38±0.4 years were selected. Cephalometric analysis was performed before and after treatment. Twenty-four variables for analyzing the hard and soft tissues of the mandible were compared between the two groups. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for the comparison of the two groups fallowed by paired t-test. The relationship between the soft and hard tissue variables was studied using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results: In both groups, the mean value of angular measurements related to B point and Pogonion (Pog) decreased with treatment (P<0.05). Similarly, the symphysis depth of soft tissue decreased (P=0.008). The mean angular value of Y-axis increased in both groups after treatment (P=0.007). The mean changes in hard tissue symphysis depth after treatment were different in the two groups (P=0.021). Vertical, horizontal and rotational changes in soft tissue B point (B’) and Pogonion (pog’) followed their underlying hard tissue changes (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Points B and Pog showed backward movement after orthodontic treatments in both extraction and non-extraction patients. Changes in B’ and Pog’ were directly influenced by the changes in the corresponding points of the underlying hard tissue. Orthodontic treatments with and without extraction of premolars produced insignificant changes in vertical facial dimension.
Keywords: Chin; Tooth Extraction; Mandible
- Rathod AB, Araujo E, Vaden JL, Behrents RG, Oliver DR. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 May;147(5):596-603.
- Sharma JN. Skeletal and soft tissue point A and B changes following orthodontic treatment of Nepalese Class I bimaxillary protrusive patients. Angle Orthod.2010 Jan; 80(1):91-6.
- Al-Abdwani R, Moles DR, Noar JH. Change of incisor inclination effects on points A and B. Angle Orthod. 2009 May;79(3):462-7.
- Hosseinzadeh Nik T, Nourozi S, Hosseinizade SM. Hard tissue response to anterior tooth retraction. IJO 2006;1:48-52.
- Konstantonis D. The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):209-17.
- Hershey HG. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postadolescent female patients. Am J Orthod. 1972 Jan;61(1):45-54.
- Basciftci FA, Usumez S. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects. Angle Orthod. 2003 Feb;73(1):36-42.
- Tan TJ. Profile changes following orthodontic correction of bimaxillary protrusion with a pre- adjusted edgewise appliance. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1996;11(3):239-51.
- Keating PJ. The treatment of bimaxillary prot- rusion: a cephalometric consideration of changes in the inter-incisal angle and soft tissue profile. Br J Orthod. 1986 Oct;13(4):209-20.
- Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107(1):28-37.
- Young TM, Smith RJ. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: A comparison of changes during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 May; 103(5):452-8.
- Verma SL, Sharma VP, Tandon P, Singh GP, Sachan K. Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Apr;4(2):206-12.
- Bowman SJ, Johnston LE Jr. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Cauca- sian patients. Angle Orthod. 2000 Feb;70(1):3-10.
- Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr. A long- term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Jul;102(1):1-14.
- Kachiwala VA, Kalha AS, Machado G. Soft tissue changes associated with first premolar extraction in adult females. Aust Orthod J. 2009 May;25(1):24-9.
- Singh RN. Changes in the soft tissue chin after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Jul;98(1):41-6.
- Kumari M, Fida M. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak.2010 Jan;20(1):17-21.
- Kocadereli I. The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):41-5.
- Jain M, Varghese J, Mascarenhas R, Mogra S, Shetty S, Dhakar N. Assessment of clinical outcomes of Roth and MBT bracket prescription using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Jul;4(3):307-12.
- Hosseinzadeh-Nik T, Farrokhzadeh AM, Golestan B. Horizontal Dental Changes during First Stage of Treatment Using the MBT Technique. J Dent (Tehran) 2007;4(1):9-14.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 13, No 3 (2016) | |
| Section | Original Article | |
| Keywords | ||
| Chin Tooth Extraction Mandible | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
