Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal
-
Amir Hossein Mirhashemi
,
Mohammad Hashem Hosseini
,
Nasim Chiniforoush
,
Armin Soudi
,
Meisam Moradi
Abstract
Objectives: Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of adhesive remnants from the ceramic bracket base.
Materials and Methods: Fifty human premolar teeth were divided into five groups. Samples in all groups were bonded to ceramic brackets. Brackets in four groups were debonded and the remaining adhesive was removed by Er:YAG laser, Er;Cr:YSGG laser, sandblasting or direct flame. After removing adhesives from the tooth surfaces by carbide bur, the recycled brackets were bonded again. in the control group, new ceramic brackets were bonded. Finally, all brackets were debonded by universal testing machine and their shear bond strength (SBS) was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was calculated under a stereomicroscope at x10 magnification. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
Results: SRS values showed no significant difference among the five groups (P=0.568). The highest SRS was noted in the control group (7.46±1.4 MPa), followed by Er:YAG laser group (7.40±1.24 Mpa) and the lowest was noted in the flame group (6.32±2.3 Mpa). ARI scores indicated that most of the adhesive remained on the tooth surface in all groups
Conclusions: Recycling of ceramic brackets with Er:YAG laser is an efficient in-office method which causes the least damage to the bracket base. However, all methods of bracket recycling showed acceptable SBS.
- Kachoei M, Mohammadi A, Esmaili Moghaddam M, Rikhtegaran S, Pourghaznein M, Shirazi S. Comparison of multiple rebond shear strengths of debonded brackets after preparation with sandblasting and CO2 laser. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(3):148-54.
- Zafarmand A, Mina M. A comparison of shear bond strength of two different techniques with that of initially bonded brackets. J Indian Orthod Soc 2014 Oct;48(6):401-405.
- Tavares SW, Consani S, Nouer DF, Magnani MBBA, Nouer PRA, Martins LM. Shear bond strength of new and recycled brackets to enamel. Braz Dent J 2006;17(1):44-8.
- Yassaei S, Aghili H, KhanPayeh E, Goldani Moghadam M. Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded brackets with four methods of adhesive removal. Lasers Med Sci 2014 Sep;29(5):1563-8.
- Chacko PK, Kodoth J, John J, Kumar K. Recycling stainless steel orthodontic brackets with Er:Yag laser – An environmental scanning electron microscope and shear bond strength study. J Orthod Sci 2013 Jul;2(3):87.
- Yassaei S, Aghili H, Hosseinzadeh Firouzabadi A, Meshkani H. Effect of Er:YAG laser and sandblasting in recycling of ceramic brackets. J Lasers Med Sci 2017 Winter;8(1):17-21.
- Shetty V, Shekatkar Y, Kumbhat N, Gautam G, Karbelkar S, Vandekar M. Bond efficacy of recycled orthodontic brackets: A comparative in vitro evaluation of two methods. Indian J Dent Res. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):411-5.
- Kumar M, Maheshwari A, Lall R, Navit P, Singh R, Navit S. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of recycled brackets using different methods: An in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Sep;6(5):5-11.
- AL-Lwezy OH, AL-Mukhtar AM, Salih SS. Recycling of ceramic bracket using burning technique (an in vitro study). Al-Rafidain Dent J 2010;10(2):238-42.
- Ishida K, Endo T, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Odontology. 2011 Jul;99(2):129-34.
- Ahrari F, Fekrazad R, Kalhori K, Ramtin M. Reconditioning of ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Lasers Med Sci 2013 Jan;28(1):223-8.
- Chung CH, Friedman D, Francis K. Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002 Sep;122(3):282-7.
- Jena AK, Duggal R, Mehrotra AK. Physical properties and clinical characteristics of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2007 Jan;20(2):101-15.
- Eminkahyagila N, Armanb A, Alev C, Karabulutd E. Effect of resin removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):314-21.
- Montero MM, Vicente A, Alfonso-Hernández N, Jiménez-López M, Bravo-González LA. Comparison of shear bond strength of brackets recycled using microsandblasting and industrial methods. Angle Orthod. 2014 Sep;85(3):461-7.
- Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2000 Feb;22(1): 13-23.
- Smith SC, Walsh LJ, Taverne AA. Removal of orthodontic bonding resin residues by CO2 laser radiation: surface effects. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999 Feb;17(1):13-8.
- Oliver RG, Pal AD. Distortion of edgewise orthodontic brackets associated with methods of debonding. Am J Orthod 1989 Jul;96(1):65-71.
-Chetan GB, Reddy M. Comparative evaluation of four office reconditioning methods for orthodontic stainless steel brackets on shear bond strength-an in vitro study. Ann Essences Dent. 2011 Jan-Mar; 3(1): 6-13.
- Matasa CG. Pros and cons of the reuse of direct bonded appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989 Jul;96(1):72-6.
- Reynolds IR, von Fraunhofer JA. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1976 Jul;3(3):143-6.
- Mizrahi E, Smith DC. Direct attachment of orthodontic brackets to dental enamel. Brit Dent J. 1971;130(4):392-6.
-Jobalia SB, Valente RM, de Rijk WG, Begole EA, Evans CA. Bond strength of visible light-cured glass ionomer orthodontic cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997 Aug;112(2):205-8.
- Blight SJ, Lynch E. Bond strengths of ceramic brackets using different bonding techniques. Br J Orthod 1995 Feb;22(1):35-40.
- Canay S, Kocadereli I, Akca E. The effect of enamel air ablation on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000 Jan;117(1):15-9.
- Regan D, LeMasney B, van Noort R. The tensile bond strength of new and rebonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod 1993 Apr;15(2):125-35.
- Wright WL, Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets. Am J Orthod. 1985 Mar;87(3):247-52.
- Mui B, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. Optimization of a procedure for rebonding dislodged orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1999 Jun;69(3):276-81.
- Eminkahyagil N, Arman A, Cetinsahin A, Karabulut E. Effect of resin removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):314-21.
-Pickett KL, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, Lacefield W. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthod. 2001 Apr;71(2):141-8.
- Montasser M, James L, Drummond C, Evans A. Rebonding of orthodontic brackets part i, a laboratory and clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):531-6.
- Retief DH, Denys FR. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments. Angle Orthod. 1979 Jan;49(1):1-10.
- Han RQ, Yang K, Ji L, Ling C. Analysis of shear bond strength and morphology of Er:Yag laser-recycled ceramic orthodontic brackets. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Mar;2016:7276287.
- Correa-Afonso AM, Palma-Dibb RG, Pecora JD. Composite filling removal with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser: morphological analyses. Lasers Med Sci 2010 Jan;25(1):1-7.
- Hibst R, Keller U. Removal of dental filling materials by Er:Yag laser radiation. Proc SPIE 1991 May;1424:120-6.
- Correa-Afonso AM, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of pulse repetition rate on temperature rise and working time during composite filling removal with the Er:YAG laser. Photomed Laser Surg 2008 Jun;26(3):221-5.
- Basudan AM, Al-Emran SE. The effects of in-office reconditioning on the morphology of slots and bases of stainless steel brackets and on the shear/peel bond strength. J Orthod 2001 Sep;28(3):231-6.
- Millett D, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 1993 May;20(2):117-22.
- Arici S, Ozer M, Arici N, Gencer Y. Effects of sandblasting metal bracket base on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Mar;17(3):253-8.
-Yim JB, Lee JW, Cha KS. Shear bond strength ofrecycled orthodontic brackets treated by variable reconditioning methods. Kore J Orthod. 1996 Oct;26(5):569-79.
- Geraldo-Martins VR, Tanji EY, Wetter NU, Nogueira RD, Eduardo CP. Intrapulpal temperature during preparation with the Er: YAG laser: an in vitro study. Photomed Laser Therap. 2005 Apr;23(2):182-6.
- Lew KK, Chew CL, Lee KW. A comparison of shear bond strengths between new and recycled ceramic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1991 Aug;13(4):306-10.
- Martina R, Laino A, Cacciafesta V, Cantiello P. Recycling effects on ceramic brackets: a dimensional, weight and shear bond strength analysis. Eur J Orthod. 1997 Dec;19(6):629-36.
- Klocke A, Korbmacher HM, Huck LG, Ghosh J, Kahl-Nieke B. Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: An evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):309-15.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 15, No 1 (2018) | |
| Section | Original Article | |
| Keywords | ||
| Lasers Recycling Orthodontic Brackets | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
