Original Article

Effect of Selected Luting Agents on the Retention of CAD/CAM Zirconia Crowns under Cyclic Environmental Pressure

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the retention strength of zirconia crowns luted with two types of resin cement under environmental pressure changes.
Materials and Methods: Thirty zirconia crowns were fabricated by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system and were cemented by Panavia F2.0 (PAN), hand-mixed RelyX Unicem (UNH), or auto-mix RelyX Unicem Aplicap (UNA) cements on the corresponding extracted human molars. The samples were randomly divided into three groups according to the cement type. After 3000 thermal cycles, the cemented crowns were subjected to 24 pressure cycles (0 to 5 atmospheres). The retention force (N) of the specimens was measured in a universal testing machine. To normalize the retentive force, the recorded force was divided by the surface area of each tooth for measuring the retentive strength (MPa). The mean retention strengths (and forces) of the groups were compared by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test (α=0.05). The failure modes were also examined by using a stereomicroscope.
Results: The retention values related to the evaluated resin cements were significantly different; the UNA group showed the highest retention strength (6.45±0.35 MPa) followed by the UNH (4.99±0.47 MPa) and PAN (4.45±0.39 MPa, P<0.001) groups. The adhesive failure mode was predominant in all the groups.
Conclusions: The choice of resin cements and their mixing methods, which lead to differences in porosity, may affect the retention strength of zirconia crowns.

- Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH. Survival and complications of zirconia-based dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Mar;107(3):170-7.

- Schmitt J, Goellner M, Lohbauer U, Wichmann M, Reich S. Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 5-year clinical results of a prospective clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(6):585-9.

- Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 5-year retrospective study of survival of zirconia single crowns fitted in a private clinical setting. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):527-30.

- Son YH, Han CH, Kim S. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing. J Dent. 2012 Oct;40(10):866-72.

- Heintze SD. Crown pull-off test (crown retention test) to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of luting agents. Dent Mater. 2010 Mar;26(3):193-206.

- Blatz MB, Phark JH, Ozer F, Mante FK, Saleh N, Bergler M, et al. In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):187-92.

- Derand T, Molin M, Kleven E. Hagg P, Karlsson S. Bond strength of luting materials to ceramic crowns after different surface treatments. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2008 Mar;16(1):35-8

- Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):71-82.

- Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18(Suppl 3):193-204.

- Mirmohammadi H, Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Innovations in bonding to zirconia based ceramics: Part III. Phosphate monomer resin cements. Dent Mater. 2010 Aug;26(8):786-92.

- Kim MJ, Kim YK, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Shear bond strengths of various luting cements to zirconia ceramic: Surface chemical aspects. J Dent. 2011 Nov;39(11):795-803.

- Hernandez AI, Roongruangphol T, Katsube N, Seghi RR. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Mar;99(3):209-17.

- Behr M, Rosentritt M, Loher H, Kolbeck C, Trempler C, Stemplinger B, et al. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types. Dent Mater. 2008 Sep;24(9):1187-93.

- Sadighpour L, Fazel A, Geramipanah F, Allahdadi M. Effect of resin cement mixing method on the retention strength of a CAD/CAM zirconia crowns. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14(Suppl 1):31-6.

- Covey DA, Ewoldsen NO. Porosity in manually and machine mixed resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;26(6):617-23.

- Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2004 Dec;20(10):972-8

- Anusavice KJ, Kakar K, Ferree N. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18(Suppl 3):218-31.

- Robichaud R, McNally ME. Barodontalgia as a differential diagnosis: symptoms and findings. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005 Jan;71(1):39-42.

- Zadik Y. Barodontalgia: what have we learned in the past decade? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Apr;109(4):e65-9.

- Zadik Y, Drucker S. Diving dentistry: a review of the dental implications of scuba diving. Aust Dent J. 2011 Sep;56(3):265-71.

- Jagger RG, Shah CA, Weerapperuma ID, Jagger DC. The prevalence of orofacial pain and tooth fracture (odontocrexis) associated with SCUBA diving. Prim Dent Care. 2009 Apr;16(2):75-8.

- Calder IM, Ramsey JD. Odontecrexis-the effects of rapid decompression on restored teeth. J Dent. 1983 Dec;11(4):318-23.

- Lyons KM, Rodda JC, Hood JA. The effect of environmental pressure changes during diving on the retentive strength of different luting agents for full cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Nov;78(5):522-7.

- Geramipanah F, Sadighpour L, Assadollahi R. The effect of environmental pressure and resin cements on the push-out bond strength of a quartz fiber post to teeth root canals. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;43(2):143-50.

- Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):551-8.

- Brylske A. The Encyclopedia of Recreational Diving, 3rd ed. Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA, International PADI Inc., 2006.

- Shahin R, Kern M. Effect of air-abrasion on the retention of zirconia ceramic crowns luted with different cements before and after artificial aging. Dent Mater. 2010 Sep;26(9):922-8.

- Ali AO, Kelly JR, Zandparsa R. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings. J Prosthodont. 2012 Dec;21(8):614-21.

- Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent. 2006 Oct;8(5):327-35.

- Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Aug;96(2):104-14.

- Faria-e-Silva AL, Moraes RR, Ogliari FA, Piva E, Martins LR. Panavia F: the role of the primer. J Oral Sci. 2009 Jun;51(2):255-9.

- Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NRFA, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent. 2004 Jan;32(1):55-65.

- D’Arcangelo C, D’Amario M, Vadini M, Zazzeroni S, De Angelis F, Caputi S. An evaluation of luting agent application technique effect on fibre post retention. J Dent. 2008 Apr;36(4):235-40.

Files
IssueVol 15, No 2 (2018) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article
Keywords
Zirconium Oxide Crowns Resin Cements Prosthesis Retention

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Sadighpour L, Geramipanah F, Fazel A, Allahdadi M, KharaziFard MJ. Effect of Selected Luting Agents on the Retention of CAD/CAM Zirconia Crowns under Cyclic Environmental Pressure. Front Dent. 2018;15(2):97-105.