Effect of Aging and Different Surface Treatments on the Repair Microshear Bond Strength of a Nanohybrid Composite Resin
Effect of Surface Treatments on Bond Strength
,
Abstract
Objectives: Repair of composite resin restorations is a challenge specially when the restoration undergoes aging; thus, this study aimed to assess the effect of aging and different surface treatments on the repair microshear bond strength of IPS Empress Direct nanohybrid composite resin.
Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated 48 IPS Empress Direct composite resin samples in two groups of aged and nonaged (n=24). The samples in both groups were finished and polished with Sof-Lex discs. Composite samples in the aged group were subjected to 5000 thermal cycles. The two groups were then divided into two subgroups (n=12) for surface roughening by a diamond bur or sandblasting with aluminum oxide particles. Composite cylinders were then bonded to the composite samples, and underwent microshear bond strength test in a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and t-test (alpha=0.05).
Results: The results showed no significant difference in the microshear bond strength of bur and sandblasted subgroups, irrespective of aging (P>0.05). In the aged subgroups, however, irrespective of the method of surface treatment, the bond strength was significantly lower than that in the subgroups that did not undergo the aging process (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Micromechanical retention is the most reliable method to achieve a high repair bond strength in IPS Empress Direct composite resin. Surface roughening by bur is safe and cost-effective, and can be used instead of sandblasting for composite restoration repair.
2. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J Dent. 2010 Jan;38(1):29-38.
3. Imbery TA, Gray T, DeLatour F, Boxx C, Best AM, Moon PC. Evaluation of flexural, diametral tensile, and shear bond strength of composite repairs. Oper Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;39(6):E250-60.
4. Hemadri M, Saritha G, Rajasekhar V, Pachlag KA, Purushotham R, Reddy VK. Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Nov-Dec;6(6):22-5.
5. Jafarzadeh Kashi TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei FS. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;36(6):608-17.
6. Kaneko M, Caldas RA, Feitosa VP, Xediek Consani RL, Schneider LF, Bacchi A. Influence of surface treatments to repair recent fillings of silorane-and methacrylate-based composites. J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):242-6.
7. Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(2):90-8; discussion 99.
8. Abo El Naga A, Zahran R. The Microshear Bond Strength of Repaired Resin Composite after different surface and bonding treatments. J Am Sci. 2017;13:79-86.
9. IPS Empress Direct. Available at https://www.ivoclar.com/en_li/products/composites/ips-empress-direct/Accessed January 8,2025
10. Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017 Mar 19;3(1):21-29.
11. Aytac F, Karaarslan ES, Agaccioglu M, Tastan E, Buldur M, Kuyucu E. Effects of Novel Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Morphology of Nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016 Jul;28(4):247-61.
12. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials-E-Book: Craig's Restorative Dental Materials-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sci; 2011 Oct 3.
13. Joulaei M, Bahari M, Ahmadi A, Savadi Oskoee S. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Repair Micro-shear Bond Strength of Silica- and Zirconia-filled Composite Resins. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012 Fall;6(4):131-7.
14. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Shankar YR, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jul;17(4):305-11.
15. Han IH, Kang DW, Chung CH, Choe HC, Son MK. Effect of various intraoral repair systems on the shear bond strength of composite resin to zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 Aug;5(3):248-55.
16. de Jesus Tavarez RR, Almeida Júnior LJDS, Guará TCG, Ribeiro IS, Maia Filho EM, Firoozmand LM. Shear bond strength of different surface treatments in bulk fill, microhybrid, and nanoparticle repair resins. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2017 Jul 3;9:61-66.
17. Hamano N, Chiang YC, Nyamaa I, Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hickel R, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the repair strength of a nanofilled resin-based composite. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(4):537-45.
18. Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Goncalves AP, Fernandez E, Loomans B, Moraes RR. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016 Sep 1;69:15-26.
19. Koç-Vural U, Kerimova L, Baltacioglu İH, Kiremitçi A. Bond strength of dental nanocomposites repaired with a bulkfill composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):e437-e442.
20. Andrade AP, Shimaoka AM, de Carvalho RC. Composite resin repairs: what is the most effective protocol?. Brazilian Dental Science. 2017 Mar 24;20(1):99-109.
21. Al-Asmar AA, Hatamleh KS, Hatamleh M, Al-Rabab'ah M. Evaluating Various Preparation Protocols on the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composite. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):182-187.
22. Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Repair Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite after Different Surface and Bonding Treatments. Materials (Basel). 2016 Jul 7;9(7):547.
23. Ritter AV, Sulaiman TA, Altitinchi A, Bair E, Baratto-Filho F, Gonzaga CC, et al. Composite-composite Adhesion as a Function of Adhesive-composite Material and Surface Treatment. Oper Dent. 2019 Jul/Aug;44(4):348-354.
24. Altinci P, Mutluay M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017 Dec 12;4(1):10-19.
25. Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2009 Apr;25(4):442-51.
26. Kouros P, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Spyrou M, Koulaouzidou E. Influence of material and surface treatment on composite repair shear bond strength. J Conserv Dent. 2018 May-Jun;21(3):251-256.
| Issue | Vol 22 (Continuously Published Article-Based) | |
| Section | Original Article | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v22i6.17839 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Aging Composite Resins Shear Strength | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
