Original Article

Comparative Evaluation of Application of Universal Bonding on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Light Cure and Dual Cure Composites Bonded to Dentin

Abstract

Objectives: There is limited knowledge on the efficacy of universal adhesives when used in different etching modes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin using universal adhesives with light-cure and dual-cure composites.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, the occlusal third of 60 caries-free human molars were removed and the exposed surfaces were treated and allocated to 10 groups (N=6). Two different bonding agents (Single Bond Universal, G-Premio) were used to bond 2 different composite resins (Z250 light-cure and CoreFlo DC dual-cure) to dentin, using etch-and-rinse (E&R) and self-etch (SE) modes. Single Bond 2 was applied in E&R mode on wet dentin to serve as control. The specimens were sectioned into 1×1 mm2 sticks with a precision saw. A microtensile testing machine was used to measure the µTBS of the specimens with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test (α=0.05).
Results: The Single Bond Universal group in SE mode with light-cure composite yielded the highest (39.24MPa), and the G-Premio SE group with dual-cure composite produced the lowest (13.65MPa) mean µTBS (P<0.05). The dominant failure mode was adhesive, in all groups.
Conclusion: The bonding agent had a significant effect on µTBS of composite to dentin, but different composites and different etching modes were not significantly different in this respect.

1. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016 Feb;32(2):e9-21.
2. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):765-76.
3. Ilday NO, Sagsoz O, Karatas O, Bayindir YZ, Rifaioglu VT. Dentin Bonding Performance and Nanoleakage Properties of Universal Adhesives in Different Etching Modes. Saudi J. Oral. Dent. Res. 2016 Sep;1(3):137-46
4. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):17-28.
5. Michaud PL, Brown M. Effect of universal adhesive etching modes on bond strength to dual-polymerizing composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Apr;119(4):657-662.
6. Reis A, Zander-Grande C, Kossatz S, Stanislawczuk R, Manso A, de Carvalho RM, et al. Effect of mode of application on the microtensile bond strength of a self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):428-35.
7. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):800-7.
8. Walter R, Swift EJ Jr, Ritter AV, Bartholomew WW, Gibson CG. Dentin bonding of an etch-and-rinse adhesive using self- and light-cured composites. Am J Dent. 2009 Aug;22(4):215-8.
9. Zhang ZY, Tian FC, Niu LN, Ochala K, Chen C, Fu BP, et al. Defying ageing: An expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives? J Dent. 2016 Feb;45:43-52.
10. Loguercio AD, Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, Reis A, Perdigão J. Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? J Dent. 2015 Sep;43(9):1060-1070.
11. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010 Dec;26(12):1176-84.
12. Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Di Lenarda R, et al. Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Oct;118(5):517-24.
13. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater. 2006 Jun;22(6):533-44.
14. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):475-84.
15. McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Enamel Bond Strength of New Universal Adhesive Bonding Agents. Oper Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):410-7.
16. Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, Loguercio AD. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):282-92.
17. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013 May;41(5):404-11.
18. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, Maruo Y, Makita Y, Okihara T, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in 'universal' adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016 Oct;32(10):1218-1225.
19. Leevailoj C, Ua-wutthikrerk P, Poolthong S. Shear bond strength of dual-cured and self-cured resin composites to dentin using different bonding agents and techniques. Oper Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):149-59.
20. Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Beloica M, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives. J Dent. 2010 Feb;38(2):106-12.
21. Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Aug;107(6):2121-2131.
22. Diniz AC, Bandeca MC, Pinheiro LM, Dos Santosh Almeida LJ Jr, Torres CR, Borges AH, et al. Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bond Strength to Enamel using Universal Adhesive Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Oct 1;17(10):820-825.
23. Jayasheel A, Niranjan N, Pamidi H, Suryakanth MB. Comparative Evaluation of shear Bond Strength of universal Dental Adhesives -An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):e892-e896.
24. Munari LS, Antunes AN, Monteiro DD, Moreira AN, Alvim HH, Magalhães CS. Microtensile bond strength of composite resin and glass ionomer cement with total-etching or self-etching universal adhesive. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2018 Apr 1;82:36-40.
25. Oz FD, Kutuk ZB, Ozturk C, Soleimani R, Gurgan S. An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1443-1452.
26. Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG,da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):7-26.
27. El-Deeb HA, Ghalab RM, Elsayed Akah MM, Mobarak EH. Repair bond strength of dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials. J Adv Res. 2016 Mar;7(2):263-9.
IssueVol 20 (Continuously Published Article-Based) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v20i39.13879
Keywords
Composite Resins Dental Bonding Tensile Strength

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Yarmohamadi E, Ahmadi B, Farhadian M. Comparative Evaluation of Application of Universal Bonding on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Light Cure and Dual Cure Composites Bonded to Dentin. Front Dent. 2023;20.