Survival of Dyna Implants: A Retrospective Study with 1 to 6 Years of Follow Up
,
Abstract
Objectives: Dental implants are a prominent scientific breakthrough and are frequently applied for replacement of the missing teeth. From the clinicians’ point of view, long-term studies are essential to find out the predictability of dental implant systems.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 1,626 patients who received 4,389 Dyna implants in a private office between 2013-2019 were evaluated. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25 for Windows. P values less than 0.1 were considered significant for regression analysis.
Results: Dyna implant
ts (4389) placed from 2013 to 2019 were evaluated in this study. One-hundred and thirty-three (3.03%) implants failed during the healing period or recall visits. Eighty-nine implants (2.03%) failed immediately and 44 (1%) failed after 3 months.
Conclusion: The present study showed that the Dyna dental implant system had high implant survival, and it had all the survival criteria similar to world-class dental implant systems.
Keywords: Dental Implants; Survival; Retrospective Studies
1. Steigenga JT, Al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch CE, Wang HL. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent. 2003 Dec;12(4):306-17.
2. Van de Velde T, Thevissen E, Persson GR, Johansson C, De Bruyn H. Two‐year outcome with Nobel Direct® implants: A retrospective radiographic and microbiologic study in 10 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Sep;11(3):183-93.
3. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B. Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials. 1983 Jan;4(1):25-8.
4. Brånemark PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson Å. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969 Jan;3(2):81-100.
5. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J.Maxillofac.Surg. 1981 Jan;9:15-25.
6. Östman PO, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Ten years later. Results from a prospective single‐centre clinical study on 121 oxidized (TiUnite™) Brånemark implants in 46 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):852-60.
7. Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10‐year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant‐supported full‐arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid‐etched implants and mucosal tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):808-15.
8. Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Brägger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. 10‐year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):839-51.
9. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Complication and failure rates with implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: A 10‐year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jun;16(3):356-64.
10. Vroom MG, Sipos P, De Lange GL, Gründemann LJ, Timmerman MF, Loos BG, et al. Effect of surface topography of screw‐shaped titanium implants in humans on clinical and radiographic parameters: a 12‐year prospective study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2009 Nov;20(11):1231-9.
11. Ortega‐Oller I, Suárez F, Galindo‐Moreno P, Torrecillas‐Martínez L, Monje A, Catena A, et al. The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta‐analysis based on prospective clinical trials. J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):569-80.
12. Erpenstein H, Kerschbaum T, Halfin T. Long-term survival of cast-gold inlays in a specialized dental practice. Clin. Oral Investig. 2001 Sep;5(3):162-6.
13. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 1. Outcome. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep;15(5):439-45.
14. Karlsson S. Failures and length of service in fixed prosthodontics after long-term function. A longitudinal clinical study. Swed. Dent. J. 1989 Jan;13(5):185-92.
15. Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Mar;13(2):253-62.
16. Arιsan V, Bölükbaşι N, Ersanlι S, Özdemir T. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5–10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):296-307.
17. Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jun;19(6):553-9.
18. Monje A, Chan HL, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindo‐Moreno P, Wang HL. Are short dental implants (< 10 mm) effective? A meta‐analysis on prospective clinical trials. J. Periodontol. 2013 Jul;84(7):895-904.
19. Sohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J. How successful are small‐diameter implants? A literature review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):515-25.
20. Galindo‐Moreno P, Nilsson P, King P, Becktor J, Speroni S, Schramm A, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants–1‐year follow‐up. Clin. Oral
Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):609-16.
21. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Small‐diameter implants: Indications and contraindications. J. Esthet. Dent. 2000 Jul;12(4):186-94.
22. Zinser MJ, Randelzhofer P, Kuiper L, Zöller JE, De Lange GL. The predictors of implant failure after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and reconstruction: a retrospective study of 1045 consecutive implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 May;115(5):571-82.
23. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann. Periodontol. 2000 Dec;5(1):22-31.
24. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G. A long‐term follow‐up study of non‐submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws: Part 1: ten‐year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2002 Jun;13(3):260-73.
25. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2‐year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005 Jun;7:s104-10.
26. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler‐Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7‐year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants: Results from a private practice. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):150-7.
27. Anitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, Andía I. Five‐year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study. J. Periodontol. 2008 Jan;79(1):42-8.
28. Geckili O, Bilhan H, Geckili E, Cilingir A, Mumcu E, Bural C. Evaluation of possible prognostic factors for the success, survival, and failure of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2014 Feb;23(1):44-50.
29. Jebreen SE, Khraisat A. Multicenter retrospective study of ITI implant‐supported posterior partial prosthesis in Jordan. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Jun;9(2):89-93.
30. Eckert SE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Apr;79(4):415-21.
31. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1981 Jan;52(2):155-70.
32. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri‐implantitis. Periodontol. 2000. 1998 Jun;17(1):63-76.
2. Van de Velde T, Thevissen E, Persson GR, Johansson C, De Bruyn H. Two‐year outcome with Nobel Direct® implants: A retrospective radiographic and microbiologic study in 10 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Sep;11(3):183-93.
3. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B. Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials. 1983 Jan;4(1):25-8.
4. Brånemark PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson Å. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969 Jan;3(2):81-100.
5. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J.Maxillofac.Surg. 1981 Jan;9:15-25.
6. Östman PO, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Ten years later. Results from a prospective single‐centre clinical study on 121 oxidized (TiUnite™) Brånemark implants in 46 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):852-60.
7. Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10‐year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant‐supported full‐arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid‐etched implants and mucosal tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):808-15.
8. Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Brägger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. 10‐year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):839-51.
9. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Complication and failure rates with implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: A 10‐year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jun;16(3):356-64.
10. Vroom MG, Sipos P, De Lange GL, Gründemann LJ, Timmerman MF, Loos BG, et al. Effect of surface topography of screw‐shaped titanium implants in humans on clinical and radiographic parameters: a 12‐year prospective study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2009 Nov;20(11):1231-9.
11. Ortega‐Oller I, Suárez F, Galindo‐Moreno P, Torrecillas‐Martínez L, Monje A, Catena A, et al. The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta‐analysis based on prospective clinical trials. J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):569-80.
12. Erpenstein H, Kerschbaum T, Halfin T. Long-term survival of cast-gold inlays in a specialized dental practice. Clin. Oral Investig. 2001 Sep;5(3):162-6.
13. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 1. Outcome. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep;15(5):439-45.
14. Karlsson S. Failures and length of service in fixed prosthodontics after long-term function. A longitudinal clinical study. Swed. Dent. J. 1989 Jan;13(5):185-92.
15. Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Mar;13(2):253-62.
16. Arιsan V, Bölükbaşι N, Ersanlι S, Özdemir T. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5–10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):296-307.
17. Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jun;19(6):553-9.
18. Monje A, Chan HL, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindo‐Moreno P, Wang HL. Are short dental implants (< 10 mm) effective? A meta‐analysis on prospective clinical trials. J. Periodontol. 2013 Jul;84(7):895-904.
19. Sohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J. How successful are small‐diameter implants? A literature review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):515-25.
20. Galindo‐Moreno P, Nilsson P, King P, Becktor J, Speroni S, Schramm A, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants–1‐year follow‐up. Clin. Oral
Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):609-16.
21. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Small‐diameter implants: Indications and contraindications. J. Esthet. Dent. 2000 Jul;12(4):186-94.
22. Zinser MJ, Randelzhofer P, Kuiper L, Zöller JE, De Lange GL. The predictors of implant failure after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and reconstruction: a retrospective study of 1045 consecutive implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 May;115(5):571-82.
23. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann. Periodontol. 2000 Dec;5(1):22-31.
24. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G. A long‐term follow‐up study of non‐submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws: Part 1: ten‐year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2002 Jun;13(3):260-73.
25. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2‐year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005 Jun;7:s104-10.
26. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler‐Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7‐year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants: Results from a private practice. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):150-7.
27. Anitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, Andía I. Five‐year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study. J. Periodontol. 2008 Jan;79(1):42-8.
28. Geckili O, Bilhan H, Geckili E, Cilingir A, Mumcu E, Bural C. Evaluation of possible prognostic factors for the success, survival, and failure of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2014 Feb;23(1):44-50.
29. Jebreen SE, Khraisat A. Multicenter retrospective study of ITI implant‐supported posterior partial prosthesis in Jordan. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Jun;9(2):89-93.
30. Eckert SE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Apr;79(4):415-21.
31. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1981 Jan;52(2):155-70.
32. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri‐implantitis. Periodontol. 2000. 1998 Jun;17(1):63-76.
| Issue | Vol 18 (Continuously Published Article-Based) | |
| Section | Original Article | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v18i45.8341 | |
| Keywords | ||
| dental implant survival Retrospective Studies | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Barikani H, Heidari M, Kharazifard M, Rokn A. Survival of Dyna Implants: A Retrospective Study with 1 to 6 Years of Follow Up. Front Dent. 2022;18.
