Effect of Clinical Rotation Timing on Learning Quality of Dental Students
Objective: Dental educational curricula are under constant modification and improvement. However, designing a comprehensive, efficient, and flexible curriculum is still challenging for the authorities. An efficient curriculum should obviate the educational needs of students and promote their knowledge and expertise for future practice. Time planning of clinical rotations is highly important for optimization of the learning process. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two different timing models of clinical rotations, namely four versus two rotations in each semester.
Materials and Methods: A total of 74 dental students and 54 faculty members of Tehran University of Medical Science that experienced both rotation models for two consecutive years (2018 and 2019) participated in this study. A questionnaire was designed to assess different aspects of the two timing-models.
Results: A one-sample t-test indicated that students' and faculty members' mean perception were significantly better regarding the two-rotation program.
Conclusion: This study indicated that changing the time planning of educational rotations can affect different aspects of education.
2. Field MJ. Dental education at the crossroads: challenges and change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1995.
3. Dabaghi-Tabriz F, Ghaffari R, Hanaee J, Barzegar M, Bilan N, Dehghani, et al. Comparison of General Dentistry Curriculum in Iran with Eight of the World's Top Dental Faculties. Maedica (Bucur). 2019 Jun;14(2):104-115.
4. Dehghan M, Harrison J, Langham S, Scarbecz M, Amini M. Comparing comprehensive care and departmental clinical education models: students' perceptions at the University of Tennessee College of Dentistry. J Dent Educ. 2015 Feb;79(2):133-9.
5. Nadershahi NA, Salmon ES, Fathi N, Schmedders K, Hargis J. Review of outcomes from a change in faculty clinic management in a U.S. dental school. J Dent Educ. 2010 Sep;74(9):961-9.
6. Evangelidis-Sakellson V. Student productivity under requirement and comprehensive care systems. J Dent Educ. 1999 May;63(5):407-13.
7. Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. In the students' own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? J Dent Educ. 2007 May;71(5):632-45.
|Issue||Vol 19 (Continuously Published Article-Based)|
|Education Dental; Curriculum Time Management|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|