Evaluation of the Determinants of Dental Implant
Running title: Evaluation of dental implant failure
Abstract
Considering the increasing use of dental implants, their failure is a serious challenge encountered by dentists. An accurate prediction of the rate of failure based on the underlying factors allows patients to accept the risk of failure. This study assessed the failure rate and time of implant treatment in patients referred to a specialized clinic. This study was conducted on implant cases in Shahid Montazeri Clinic in Tehran, Iran, from March 2008 to March 2017. A total of 544 patients including 248 patients in the failure group (case) and 296 patients in the treatment success group (control) were evaluated. Data were analyzed using the univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Males, older patients, posterior implant placement site, and shorter height and/or diameter of dental implants increased the risk of failure (P<0.05). The implant brand was also an effective factor in the failure rate (P<0.001). Implants with smaller length or diameter were more prone to failure. Accordingly, in selecting a dental implant, attention should be paid to the patient's age, sex, and location of implant to reduce the failure rate by increasing the diameter and length of implant.
2. Chrcanovic B, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Factors influencing early dental implant failures. J Dent Res. 2016 Aug;95(9):995-1002.
3. Gherde C, Dhatrak P, Nimbalkar S, Joshi S. A comprehensive review of factors affecting fatigue life of dental implants. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021 Jan 1;43:1117-23.
4. Yang Y, Hu H, Zeng M, Chu H, Gan Z, Duan J, Rong M. The survival rates and risk factors of implants in the early stage: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jun 9;21(1):293.
5. Wu X, Chen S, Ji W, Shi B. The risk factors of early implant failure: A retrospective study of 6113 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):280-8.
6. Abdel-Halim M, Issa D, Chrcanovic BR. The impact of dental implant length on failure rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials. 2021 Jul;14(14):3972.
7. Turkistani KA, Alkayyal MA, Abbassy MA, Al-Dharrab AA, Zahran MH, Melis M, Zawawi KH. Comparison of occlusal bite force distribution in subjects with different occlusal characteristics. CRANIO®. 2023 May 4;41(3):204-11.
8. Stoichkov B, Kirov D. Analysis of the causes of dental implant fracture: A retrospective clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2018 Apr;49(4):279-86.
9. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Bone level changes proximal to oral implants supporting fixed partial prostheses. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):162-8.
10. Boboeva O, Kwon TG, Kim JW, Lee ST, Choi SY. Comparing factors affecting dental‐implant loss between age groups: A retrospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Apr;23(2):208-15.
11. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bone quality and quantity and dental implant failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont . 2017 May/June;30(3):219–37.
12. Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol . 2006 Aug;77(8):1410-20.
13. Hickin MP, Shariff JA, Jennette PJ, Finkelstein J, Papapanou PN. Incidence and determinants of dental implant failure: a review of electronic health records in a US dental school. J Dent Educ. 2017 Oct;81(10):1233-42.
14. Hosseinifard H, Baghestani AR, Jafarian M, Bayat M, Pakravan AH, Shamszadeh S, et al. Effect of implant diameter and length on its survival rate in disabled Iranian veterans using frailty models. J Maz Univ Med Sci. 2017 Apr;27(147):240-8
| Issue | Vol 22 (Continuously Published Article-Based) | |
| Section | Original Article | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v22i20.18761 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Dental Implants Treatment Failure Dental Prosthesis | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
