Effect of Bioactive Glass (BAG) on dentinal shear bond strength of composite resins using universal dental adhesive with different application modes and storage times
-
Seyed Mostafa Mosavinasab
,
Kamyar Fathpoor
,
Babak Sarrafpoor
,
Sepidehsaadat Mousavinasab
,
Mohamad Hossein Fakour
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the effect Bioactive Glass (BAG) on dentinal shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin.
Materials and Methods: 120 healthy and intact third molar teeth were selected for this study. Superficial dentin was revealed from 3mm above CEJ by cross sectioning. Then the samples according to the bonding technique and the time of shear bond strength test (after 24 hours, after 3 months of storage in distilled water) were divided into six main groups. Then composite resin applied on exposed dentin surface in 1 mm plastic tubes. The SBS of the samples in each batch was calculated at the initial time and after keeping in distilled water for 3 months with a universal testing machine). For Statistical; analysis Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests with Ben Feroni correction were used. The significance level was p<0.05.
Results: In the initial time (after 24 hours), effect of adhesive application method (P=0.769), method of adding BAG particles (P=0.951) and the interaction between them (P=0.547) are not significant. During the storage time (3 months of storage in distilled water), effect of adhesive application method is not significant (P=0.417). effect of adding BAG particles is significant (P=0.002) and the interaction effect is not significant (P=0.820).
Conclusion: the use of bioactive glass nano particles (45S5) with a low percentage (1%) as a universal dental adhesive filler can increase the strength and maintain the durability of the bond to dentin. This effect is independent of the adhesive application technique.
1. Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leloup G, Leprince JG. Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2016 Dec;32(12):1586-99.
2. Acharya MR, Venitz J, Figg WD, Sparreboom A. Chemically modified tetracyclines as inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases. Drug Resist Updat. 2004 Jun;7(3):195-208.
3. Magne P, Mori Ubaldini AL. Thermal and bioactive optimization of a unidose 3-step etch-and-rinse dentin adhesive. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Oct;124(4):487.e1-7.
4. Brackett WW, Ito S, Tay FR, Haisch LD, Pashley DH. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins: effect of a hydrophobic layer. Oper Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;30(6):733-8.
5. Golub LM, Ramamurthy NS, McNamara TF, Greenwald RA, Rifkin BR. Tetracyclines inhibit connective tissue breakdown: new therapeutic implications for an old family of drugs. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1991 Jan;2(3):297-321.
6. Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Nov;17(11):967-78.
7. Hao JL, Nagano T, Nakamura M, Kumagai N, Mishima H, Nishida T. Galardin inhibits collagen degradation by rabbit keratocytes by inhibiting the activation of pro-matrix metalloproteinases. Exp Eye Res. 1999 May;68(5):565-72.
8. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, et al. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005 Summer;7(2):133-41.
9. Mousavinasab SM, Atai M, Barekatain M, Fattahi P, Fattahi A, Rakhshan V. Effects of ethanol concentrations of acrylate-based dental adhesives on microtensile composite-dentin bond strength and hybrid layer structure of a 10 wt% polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-incorporated bonding agent. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Aug;15(1):25-32.
10. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, et al. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004 Mar;83(3):216-21.
11. Scaffa PM, Vidal CM, Barros N, Gesteira TF, Carmona AK, Breschi L, et al. Chlorhexidine inhibits the activity of dental cysteine cathepsins. J Dent Res. 2012 Apr;91(4):420-5.
12. Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 2013 Jan;9(1):4457-86.
13. Mirzakhani M, Mousavinasab SM, Atai M. The effect of acrylate-based dental adhesive solvent content on microleakage in composite restorations. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016 Nov-Dec;13(6):515-20.
14. Tiskaya M, Shahid S, Gillam D, Hill R. The use of bioactive glass (BAG) in dental composites: A critical review. Dent Mater. 2021 Feb;37(2):296-310.
15. Carvalho EM, Lima DM, Carvalho CN, Loguercio AD, Martinelli JR, Bauer J. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion on dentin with experimental niobophosphate bioactive glass on the microtensile bond strength of resin cements. J Prosthodont Res. 2015 Feb;59(2):129-35.
16. Bauer J, Silva ESA, Carvalho EM, Ferreira PVC, Carvalho CN, Manso AP, et al. Dentin pretreatment with 45S5 and niobophosphate bioactive glass: Effects on pH, antibacterial, mechanical properties of the interface and microtensile bond strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Feb;90:374-80.
17. Niu LN, Zhang W, Pashley DH, Breschi L, Mao J, Chen JH, et al. Biomimetic remineralization of dentin. Dent Mater. 2014 Jan;30(1):77-96.
18. Sauro S, Pashley DH. Strategies to stabilise dentine-bonded interfaces through remineralising operative approaches – State of The Art. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2016 Sep;69(44):39-57.
19. Perarivalan I, Karunakaran J, Anbalagan N, Harishma S, Prasad V. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in restorative dentistry. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jun;27(6):566-71.
20. Lee JH, Kang MS, Mahapatra C, Kim HW. Effect of Aminated Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles on the Differentiation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells. PLoS One. 2016 Mar;11(3):e0150727.
21. Wang S, Gao X, Gong W, Zhang Z, Chen X, Dong Y. Odontogenic differentiation and dentin formation of dental pulp cells under nanobioactive glass induction. Acta bBiomaterialia. 2014 Jun;10 (6):2792-803.
22. Odermatt R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Bioactivity and physico-chemical properties of dental composites functionalized with nano- vs. micro-sized bioactive glass. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar;9(3):772.
23. Skallevold HE, Rokaya D, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS. Bioactive glass applications in dentistry. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov;20(23):5960.
24. Yadav S, Yadav D, Kumar P, Yadav A, Nirala G, Yadav S. Bioactive glass for biomedical application: An overview. In: Kumar U, editor. Defects engineering in electroceramics for energy applications. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2024 Dec. p. 305-27.
25. De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CW, Ladik I, Convents R, Declercq H, Martens LC, et al. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. Dent Mater. 2017 Apr;33(4):e186-203.
26. Choi Y, Sun W, Kim Y, Kim IR, Gong MK, Yoon SY, et al. Effects of Zn-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles in etch-and-rinse adhesive on the microtensile bond strength. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Sep;10(10):1943.
27. Oltramare R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Short- and long-term dentin bond strength of bioactive glass-modified dental adhesives. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Jul;11(8):1894.
28. Bauer J, Carvalho EM, Carvalho CN, Meier MM, de Souza JP, de Carvalho RM, Loguercio AD. Development of a simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive containing niobiophosphate bioactive glass. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016 Sep;69:110-4.
2. Acharya MR, Venitz J, Figg WD, Sparreboom A. Chemically modified tetracyclines as inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases. Drug Resist Updat. 2004 Jun;7(3):195-208.
3. Magne P, Mori Ubaldini AL. Thermal and bioactive optimization of a unidose 3-step etch-and-rinse dentin adhesive. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Oct;124(4):487.e1-7.
4. Brackett WW, Ito S, Tay FR, Haisch LD, Pashley DH. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins: effect of a hydrophobic layer. Oper Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;30(6):733-8.
5. Golub LM, Ramamurthy NS, McNamara TF, Greenwald RA, Rifkin BR. Tetracyclines inhibit connective tissue breakdown: new therapeutic implications for an old family of drugs. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1991 Jan;2(3):297-321.
6. Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Nov;17(11):967-78.
7. Hao JL, Nagano T, Nakamura M, Kumagai N, Mishima H, Nishida T. Galardin inhibits collagen degradation by rabbit keratocytes by inhibiting the activation of pro-matrix metalloproteinases. Exp Eye Res. 1999 May;68(5):565-72.
8. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, et al. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005 Summer;7(2):133-41.
9. Mousavinasab SM, Atai M, Barekatain M, Fattahi P, Fattahi A, Rakhshan V. Effects of ethanol concentrations of acrylate-based dental adhesives on microtensile composite-dentin bond strength and hybrid layer structure of a 10 wt% polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-incorporated bonding agent. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Aug;15(1):25-32.
10. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, et al. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004 Mar;83(3):216-21.
11. Scaffa PM, Vidal CM, Barros N, Gesteira TF, Carmona AK, Breschi L, et al. Chlorhexidine inhibits the activity of dental cysteine cathepsins. J Dent Res. 2012 Apr;91(4):420-5.
12. Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 2013 Jan;9(1):4457-86.
13. Mirzakhani M, Mousavinasab SM, Atai M. The effect of acrylate-based dental adhesive solvent content on microleakage in composite restorations. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016 Nov-Dec;13(6):515-20.
14. Tiskaya M, Shahid S, Gillam D, Hill R. The use of bioactive glass (BAG) in dental composites: A critical review. Dent Mater. 2021 Feb;37(2):296-310.
15. Carvalho EM, Lima DM, Carvalho CN, Loguercio AD, Martinelli JR, Bauer J. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion on dentin with experimental niobophosphate bioactive glass on the microtensile bond strength of resin cements. J Prosthodont Res. 2015 Feb;59(2):129-35.
16. Bauer J, Silva ESA, Carvalho EM, Ferreira PVC, Carvalho CN, Manso AP, et al. Dentin pretreatment with 45S5 and niobophosphate bioactive glass: Effects on pH, antibacterial, mechanical properties of the interface and microtensile bond strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Feb;90:374-80.
17. Niu LN, Zhang W, Pashley DH, Breschi L, Mao J, Chen JH, et al. Biomimetic remineralization of dentin. Dent Mater. 2014 Jan;30(1):77-96.
18. Sauro S, Pashley DH. Strategies to stabilise dentine-bonded interfaces through remineralising operative approaches – State of The Art. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2016 Sep;69(44):39-57.
19. Perarivalan I, Karunakaran J, Anbalagan N, Harishma S, Prasad V. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in restorative dentistry. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jun;27(6):566-71.
20. Lee JH, Kang MS, Mahapatra C, Kim HW. Effect of Aminated Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles on the Differentiation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells. PLoS One. 2016 Mar;11(3):e0150727.
21. Wang S, Gao X, Gong W, Zhang Z, Chen X, Dong Y. Odontogenic differentiation and dentin formation of dental pulp cells under nanobioactive glass induction. Acta bBiomaterialia. 2014 Jun;10 (6):2792-803.
22. Odermatt R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Bioactivity and physico-chemical properties of dental composites functionalized with nano- vs. micro-sized bioactive glass. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar;9(3):772.
23. Skallevold HE, Rokaya D, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS. Bioactive glass applications in dentistry. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov;20(23):5960.
24. Yadav S, Yadav D, Kumar P, Yadav A, Nirala G, Yadav S. Bioactive glass for biomedical application: An overview. In: Kumar U, editor. Defects engineering in electroceramics for energy applications. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2024 Dec. p. 305-27.
25. De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CW, Ladik I, Convents R, Declercq H, Martens LC, et al. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. Dent Mater. 2017 Apr;33(4):e186-203.
26. Choi Y, Sun W, Kim Y, Kim IR, Gong MK, Yoon SY, et al. Effects of Zn-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles in etch-and-rinse adhesive on the microtensile bond strength. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Sep;10(10):1943.
27. Oltramare R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Short- and long-term dentin bond strength of bioactive glass-modified dental adhesives. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Jul;11(8):1894.
28. Bauer J, Carvalho EM, Carvalho CN, Meier MM, de Souza JP, de Carvalho RM, Loguercio AD. Development of a simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive containing niobiophosphate bioactive glass. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016 Sep;69:110-4.
| Issue | Vol 22 (Continuously Published Article-Based) | |
| Section | Original Article | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v22i24.18868 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Bioactive Glass 45S5 Dental Cements Shear Strength Dentin-Bonding Agents | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Mosavinasab SM, Fathpoor K, Sarrafpoor B, Mousavinasab S, Fakour MH. Effect of Bioactive Glass (BAG) on dentinal shear bond strength of composite resins using universal dental adhesive with different application modes and storage times. Front Dent. 2025;22.
