A Comparative Analysis of Staining Effects on Translucency in Two Transparent Retainers Exposed to Various Cleansers
Objectives: Due to their aesthetic appeal and translucent properties, clear thermoplastic retainers have become increasingly popular. However, ensuring their proper maintenance and cleaning is a significant challenge. It is essential to prevent any negative impact of cleaning solutions on the translucency and color consistency of retainers. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of different cleaning solutions on the light transmission (translucency) rate of two distinct types of clear thermoplastic sheets.
Materials and Methods: Two different clear thermoplastic sheets (Erkodent, Shodental), and five disinfectant solutions including chlorhexidine, Listerine, hydrogen peroxide, GUM whitening, and acid acetic served as the study materials and distilled water was used as control. The samples in each group (N=12) were immersed in the respective solutions for 15 minutes, twice a week and their light transmittance was measured using spectrophotometry after one and three months. Statistical analysis was conducted using two-way analysis of variance, with the significance level set at P<0.05
Results: Light transmittance decreased from baseline to 3 months for all study groups. After three months, the lowest translucency was related to retainers manufactured with Erkodent sheets, cleaned with GUM whitening (74.11±10.72%). The highest translucency after this period was found in retainers prepared with Shodental sheets immersed in Listerine mouthwash (88±1.55%). Only retainers treated with hydrogen peroxide showed significant difference between the thermoplastic sheets, which was higher in Erkodent (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Our findings indicated that among the studied solutions, cleaning translucent retainers with Listerine mouthwash twice a week has the least effect on light transmission.
2. Arvystas MG. Maintaining orthodontic success: retention for the adult patient. J Esthet Dent. 1996;8(6):279-83.
3. Chang CS, Al-Awadi S, Ready D, Noar J. An assessment of the effectiveness of mechanical and chemical cleaning of Essix orthodontic retainer. J Orthod. 2014 Jun;41(2):110-7.
4. Saffar Shahroudi A, Bahrami R. An Overview of Fixed and Removable Orthodontic Retainers. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2020 Dec 10;30(191):166-75.
5. Kalha AS. Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers following orthodontic treatment? Evid Based Dent. 2014 Dec;15(4):110-1.
6. Gracco A, Mazzoli A, Favoni O, Conti C, Ferraris P, Tosi G, et al. Short-term chemical and physical changes in invisalign appliances. Aust Orthod J. 2009 May;25(1):34-40.
7. Kolenbrander PE, London J. Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence. J Bacteriol. 1993 Jun;175(11):3247-52.
8. Zafeiriadis AA, Karamouzos A, Athanasiou AE, Eliades T, Palaghias G. In vitro spectrophotometric evaluation of Vivera clear thermoplastic retainer discolouration. Aust Orthod J. 2014 Nov;30(2):192-200.
9. Gardner GD, Dunn WJ, Taloumis L. Wear comparison of thermoplastic materials used for orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):294-7.
10. Chang CS, Al-Awadi S, Ready D, Noar J. An assessment of the effectiveness of mechanical and chemical cleaning of Essix orthodontic retainer. J Orthod. 2014 Jun;41(2):110-7.
11. Wible E, Agarwal M, Altun S, Ramir T, Viana G, Evans C, et al. Long-term effects of different cleaning methods on copolyester retainer properties. Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):221-227.
12. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1994 Nov;10(6):353-62.
13. Spink LS, Rungruanganut P, Megremis S, Kelly JR. Comparison of an absolute and surrogate measure of relative translucency in dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2013 Jun;29(6):702-7.
14. Moslemzadeh SH, Sohrabi A, Rafighi A, Ghojazadeh M, Rahmanian S. Comparison of survival time of Hawley and Vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic patients - a randomized clinical trial. ABCMed. 2017;5:7–15.
15. Meade MJ, Millett DT, Cronin M. Social perceptions of orthodontic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Dec;36(6):649-56.
16. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):27-35.
17. Ziuchkovski JP, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Lindsey DT. Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4 Suppl):S68-78.
18. Supranoto SC, Slot DE, Addy M, Van der Weijden GA. The effect of chlorhexidine dentifrice or gel versus chlorhexidine mouthwash on plaque, gingivitis, bleeding and tooth discoloration: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 May;13(2):83-92.
19. Karpiński TM, Szkaradkiewicz AK. Chlorhexidine--pharmaco-biological activity and application. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Apr;19(7):1321-6.
20. Guerra F, Pasqualotto D, Rinaldo F, Mazur M, Corridore D, Nofroni I, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes and its adverse events: Performance-related evaluation of mouthwashes added with Anti-Discoloration System and cetylpyridinium chloride. Int J Dent Hyg. 2019 Aug;17(3):229-236.
21. Agarwal M, Wible E, Ramir T, Altun S, Viana G, Evans C, et al. Long-term effects of seven cleaning methods on light transmittance, surface roughness, and flexural modulus of polyurethane retainer material. Angle Orthod. 2018 May;88(3):355-362.
22. Brehove JM. Effects of cleaning agents on the properties of two different thermoplastic retainer materials (Doctoral dissertation, Marquette University).
|Issue||Vol 20 (Continuously Published Article-Based)|
|Mouthwashes Orthodontic Retainers Orthodontic Appliances Removable Orthodontics Translucency Spectrophotometry|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|