Comparison of the physical properties of three resin-based root canal sealers: An in-vitro study
Abstract
This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the physical properties of three resin-based root canal sealers (BETA RCS, AH26, and Adseal) in terms of flow and film thickness as per ISO 6876/2012. The results revealed that the flow values of BETA RCS, Adseal, and AH26 sealers were 23.06±1.58, 22.5±4.23, and 21.85±1.71, respectively. Moreover, film thickness values for BETA RCS, Adseal, and AH26 sealers were 52.33±2.51, 18.66±0.57, and 52±2, respectively. No significant difference was observed regarding film thickness between AH26 and BETA RCS sealers (P>0.05), while Adseal showed better result in terms of film thickness than other sealers (P˂0.05). The highest solubility was related to BETA RCS (0.6%), and the lowest to Adseal (0.07%). However, all sealers had acceptable solubility and radiopacity. The findings of the current study suggested that all tested root canal sealers had similar properties based on ISO 6876 standard criteria.
2. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6.
3. Razdan A, Benetti AR, Bjørndal L. Do in vitro solubility studies on endodontic sealers demonstrate a high level of evidence? A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 May;77(4):253-263.
4. Lee JK, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Lee W, Kim HC. Physicochemical Properties of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2017;2017:2582849.
5. Song YS, Choi Y, Lim MJ, Yu MK, Hong CU, Lee KW, et al. In vitro evaluation of a newly produced resin-based endodontic sealer. Restor Dent Endod. 2016 Aug;41(3):189-95.
6. Marciano MA, Guimarães BM, Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Cavenago BC, Garcia RB, et al. Physical properties and interfacial adaptation of three epoxy resin-based sealers. J Endod. 2011 Oct;37(10):1417-21.
7. Dos Santos Costa FM, Fernandes MH, Batistuzzo de Medeiros SR. Genotoxicity of root canal sealers: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3347-3362.
8. Ashraf H, Najafi F, Heidari S, Mohammadian M, Zadsirjan S. Physical Properties and Chemical Characterization of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin Root Canal Sealers. Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):149-156.
9. Azadi N, Fallahdoost A, Mehrvarzfar P, Rakhshan H, Rakhshan V. A four-week solubility assessment of AH-26 and four new root canal sealers. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jan;9(1):31-5.
10. Cardona Hidalgo JC, González Carreño JM, Avendaño Rueda JC. Physicochemical properties of two epoxy resin-based sealants: Topseal® and AdSeal™. A comparative study. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia 2019;31(1):68e76.
11. International Standards Organization. Dentistry - root canal sealing materials (ISO 6876:2012) Geneva: ISO; 2012.
12. Rossato TCA, Gallas JA, da Rosa WLO, da Silva AF, Piva E, Peralta SL, et al. Experimental Sealers Containing Metal Methacrylates: Physical and Biological Properties. J Endod. 2017 Oct;43(10):1725-1729.
13. Razmi H, Parvizi S, Khorshidian A. Comparison of AH26 Physicochemical Properties with Two AH26/Antibiotic Combinations. Iran Endod J. 2010 Winter;5(1):6-10. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
14. Milani AS, Moeinian A, Barhaghi MHS, Abdollahi AA. Evaluation of the film thickness and antibacterial property of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with propylene glycol as a root canal sealer. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Mar 17;17(2):142-146.
15. Silva EJ, Perez R, Valentim RM, Belladonna FG, De-Deus GA, Lima IC, et al. Dissolution, dislocation and dimensional changes of endodontic sealers after a solubility challenge: a micro-CT approach. Int Endod J. 2017 Apr;50(4):407-414.
16. Chang SW, Lee YK, Zhu Q, Shon WJ, Lee WC, Kum KY, Baek SH, et al. Comparison of the rheological properties of four root canal sealers. Int J Oral Sci. 2015 Mar 23;7(1):56-61.
Issue | Vol 20 (Continuously Published Article-Based) | |
Section | Original Article | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v20i34.13651 | |
Keywords | ||
Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer Solubility Root Canal Filling Material |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |