Original Article

Evaluation of the Effect of MTAD on Expression of Enterococcus faecalis Virulence Factors Considering the Role of Different Obturating Materials

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of MTAD on the expression of virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis (E.faecalis) considering the role of Gutta-percha/AH26 or Resilon/RealSeal SE as root canal obturating materials.
Materials and Methods: One-hundred and forty-four single-rooted human teeth were instrumented to a standardized apical size. Root canals were infected by E.faecalis (ATCC 29212). Ninety teeth were irrigated with MTAD and randomly divided into three groups. In two groups, root canals were obturated by either Gutta-percha/AH26 or Resilon/RealSeal SE. Root canals were kept unobturated in the third group. The remaining 54 teeth received no final irrigation. All groups were then subdivided into three timepoint subgroups in which dentin powder was obtained from each sample to determine the expression of specific virulence factors of E.faecalis (efa, esp, gel, fsr) using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test. The statistical power was set at P-value ≤0.05.
Results: MTAD was effective against the expression of most of the tested virulence factors, and Gutta-percha/AH26 increased the antibacterial efficacy of MTAD.
Conclusions: MTAD could inhibit the expression of some known virulence factors of E.faecalis at the majority of tested timepoints. This may partly explain some of the mechanisms of antimicrobial efficacy of MTAD against this resistant microorganism which is known as one of the main causes of failure of root canal treatment.

References:

Bolhari, B., et al., Residual Antimicrobial Activity of MTAD((R)) in Human Dentin After Obturation with Gutta-Percha/AH26 and Resilon/RealSeal SE at Different Time Intervals; An Ex Vivo Study. J Dent (Tehran), 2014. 11(1): p. 30-7.

Shokouhinejad, N., et al., Push-out bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany self-etch and gutta-percha/AH26 after different irrigation protocols. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2010. 110(5): p. e88-e92.

Zhang, C., J. Du, and Z. Peng, Correlation between Enterococcus faecalis and Persistent Intraradicular Infection Compared with Primary Intraradicular Infection: A Systematic Review. J Endod, 2015. 41(8): p. 1207-13.

Farahani, A., State of Globe: Enterococci: Virulence Factors and Biofilm Formation. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, 2016. 8(1): p. 1-2.

Tendolkar, P.M., A.S. Baghdayan, and N. Shankar, Putative surface proteins encoded within a novel transferable locus confer a high-biofilm phenotype to Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol, 2006. 188(6): p. 2063-72.

Giard, J.C., et al., Characterization of Ers, a PrfA-like regulator of Enterococcus faecalis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 2006. 46(3): p. 410-8.

Preethee, T., D. Kandaswamy, and R. Hannah, Molecular identification of an Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis antigen efaA in root canals of therapy-resistant endodontic infections. Journal of Conservative Dentistry : JCD, 2012. 15(4): p. 319-322.

Sedgley, C.M., et al., Virulence, phenotype and genotype characteristics of endodontic Enterococcus spp. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2005. 20(1): p. 10-9.

Lowe, A.M., P.A. Lambert, and A.W. Smith, Cloning of an Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis antigen: homology with adhesins from some oral streptococci. Infect Immun, 1995. 63(2): p. 703-6.

Toledo-Arana, A., et al., The Enterococcal Surface Protein, Esp, Is Involved in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Formation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001. 67(10): p. 4538-4545.

Singh, K.V., et al., Fsr-Independent Production of Protease(s) May Explain the Lack of Attenuation of an Enterococcus faecalis fsr Mutant Versus a gelE-sprE Mutant in Induction of Endocarditis. Infection and Immunity, 2005. 73(8): p. 4888-4894.

Qin, X., et al., Characterization of fsr, a regulator controlling expression of gelatinase and serine protease in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J Bacteriol, 2001. 183(11): p. 3372-82.

Hancock, L.E. and M. Perego, The Enterococcus faecalis fsr two-component system controls biofilm development through production of gelatinase. J Bacteriol, 2004. 186(17): p. 5629-39.

Mohamed, J.A. and B.E. Murray, Influence of the fsr locus on biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis lacking gelE. J Med Microbiol, 2006. 55(Pt 12): p. 1747-50.

Torabinejad, M., et al., The antimicrobial effect of MTAD: an in vitro investigation. J Endod, 2003. 29(6): p. 400-3.

BioPure® MTAD® Root Canal Cleanser, D.T.D. Specialties, Editor. 2010, DENTSPLY International, Inc. .

Hasson, A.H. and S.A. Kadhem, Identification of Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Infected Human Tooth Root Canals Human by Using Polymerase Chain Reaction. Ibn AL- Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Science, 2017. 28(2): p. 246-253.

Gomes, B.P.F.A., et al., Microbial Analysis of Canals of Root-filled Teeth with Periapical Lesions Using Polymerase Chain Reaction. Journal of Endodontics, 2008. 34(5): p. 537-540.

Sun, J., et al., Occurrence, population structure, and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci in marginal and apical periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol, 2009. 47(7): p. 2218-25.

Stuart, C.H., et al., Enterococcus faecalis: Its Role in Root Canal Treatment Failure and Current Concepts in Retreatment. Journal of Endodontics, 2006. 32(2): p. 93-98.

Kristich, C.J., et al., Esp-independent biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol, 2004. 186(1): p. 154-63.

Haas, W., B.D. Shepard, and M.S. Gilmore, Two-component regulator of Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin responds to quorum-sensing autoinduction. Nature, 2002. 415(6867): p. 84-7.

Newberry, B.M., et al., The antimicrobial effect of biopure MTAD on eight strains of Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro investigation. J Endod, 2007. 33(11): p. 1352-4.

Johal, S., J.C. Baumgartner, and J.G. Marshall, Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of 1.3% NaOCl/BioPure MTAD to 5.25% NaOCl/15% EDTA for root canal irrigation. J Endod, 2007. 33(1): p. 48-51.

Giardino, L., et al., Antimicrobial effect of MTAD, Tetraclean, Cloreximid, and sodium hypochlorite on three common endodontic pathogens. Indian J Dent Res, 2009. 20(3): p. 391.

Rasimick, B.J., et al., Stability of doxycycline and chlorhexidine absorbed on root canal dentin. J Endod, 2010. 36(3): p. 489-92.

Hashem, A.A., et al., The effect of different irrigating solutions on bond strength of two root canal-filling systems. J Endod, 2009. 35(4): p. 537-40.

Moorer, W.R. and J.M. Genet, Antibacterial activity of gutta-percha cones attributed to the zinc oxide component. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1982. 53(5): p. 508-17.

Bolhari, B., et al., Stability of Doxycycline Absorbed on Root Canal Dentin After Obturation with Gutta-Percha/AH26 and Resilon/RealSeal at Different Time Intervals. J Dent (Tehran), 2013. 10(4): p. 367-75.

Shin, S.J., et al., Comparison of regrowth of Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules after sealing with gutta-percha or Resilon. J Endod, 2008. 34(4): p. 445-8.

Files
IssueVol 15, No 6 (2018) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article
Keywords
Enterococcus faecalis Gutta-Percha MTAD Resilon Sealer Virulence Factors

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Bolhari B, Bahador A, Khoshkhounejad M, Sobhi Afshar M, Moghaddaszadeh M. Evaluation of the Effect of MTAD on Expression of Enterococcus faecalis Virulence Factors Considering the Role of Different Obturating Materials. Front Dent. 2018;15(6):382-392.